The taxonomic status of two poorly described Chinese spiders: Cheiracanthium gobi Schmidt & Barensteiner, 2000 (Araneae: Cheiracanthidae) and Alopecosa hoevelsi Schmidt & Barensteiner, 2000 (Araneae: Lycosidae).

  • Published In: Arachnology, 2025, v. 20, n. 4. P. 513 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Sherwood, Danniella; Geci, Donard; Lin, Yejie 3 of 3

Abstract

This article reassesses the taxonomic status of two poorly described spider species from the Gobi Desert in China: *Cheiracanthium gobi* (family Cheiracanthidae) and *Alopecosa hoevelsi* (family Lycosidae), both originally described by Schmidt and Barensteiner in 2000. Examination of the holotype male of *C. gobi* supports its validity as a distinct species based on unique morphological features, though its relationship to the female-only described *Cheiracanthium potanini* remains unresolved pending further material. In contrast, *A. hoevelsi* is designated as a species inquirenda due to the poor condition of the holotype female, limited genitalia data, and the need for additional specimens, especially males, to clarify its taxonomic placement within the *Alopecosa* genus. The study highlights challenges in spider taxonomy arising from incomplete original descriptions and specimen preservation. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Arachnology. 2025/12, Vol. 20, Issue 4, p513
  • Document Type:Abstract
  • Subject Area:Agriculture and Agribusiness
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:2050-9928
  • Accession Number:192454643
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Arachnology is the property of British Arachnological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.