JOURNAL ARTICLE
The relation between brain-learning physiology and conceptualization methods in the design process of architecture students.
Published In: Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2023, v. 22, n. 1. P. 7 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Mahmoodi, Amir Saeid M.; Bastani, Mahyar 3 of 3
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between brain dominance, based on Ned Herrmann's brain physiology model, and preferred conceptualization methods in the architectural design process among Iranian architecture students. It identifies four main conceptual design methods—analogical, typological, pragmatic, and theoretical—and correlates these with four brain quadrant dominances: A (left-cerebral), B (left-limbic), C (right-limbic), and D (right-cerebral). The study, involving over 350 students, found that A quadrant dominant students prefer pragmatic and theoretical methods; B quadrant dominant students favor typological methods; C quadrant dominant students lean toward theoretical methods; and D quadrant dominant students prefer analogical and theoretical methods. The findings suggest that architectural educators should tailor teaching approaches to students' brain dominance and learning styles to enhance conceptualization skills in design education.
Additional Information
- Source:Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education. 2023/04, Vol. 22, Issue 1, p7
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Anatomy and Physiology
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1474-273X
- DOI:10.1386/adch_00060_1
- Accession Number:164761367
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education is the property of Intellect Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.