JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative hemodynamic assessment of saccular and fusiform aneurysms in patient-specific internal carotid artery models: Rupture risk analyses.

  • Published In: Physics of Fluids, 2025, v. 37, n. 5. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Shi, Yinggui; Zhang, Chun; Wang, Qiushi 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on a comparative computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of hemodynamic parameters in patient-specific models of saccular, fusiform, and normal internal carotid arteries (ICA) to assess aneurysm rupture risk. Using transient, laminar, non-Newtonian blood flow simulations under two pulsatile inlet profiles, the study evaluates wall shear stress (WSS), velocity, oscillatory shear index (OSI), and pressure drop across these morphologies. Results indicate that the normal artery exhibits the highest WSS and flow velocity, suggesting a stable but high-shear environment; the fusiform aneurysm shows the lowest WSS and velocity but the highest OSI, reflecting disturbed flow; and the saccular aneurysm presents the greatest pressure drop and evidence of flow recirculation, implying increased flow resistance. These findings underscore the influence of aneurysm shape and pulsatile flow conditions on vascular hemodynamics, which are critical for personalized risk assessment and treatment planning.

Additional Information

  • Source:Physics of Fluids. 2025/05, Vol. 37, Issue 5, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Anatomy and Physiology
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1070-6631
  • DOI:10.1063/5.0269939
  • Accession Number:185593444
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Physics of Fluids is the property of American Institute of Physics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.