JOURNAL ARTICLE
Stonehenge in Punch Cartoons 1860-1999: A Leaky Pipeline from Experts to the Public.
Published In: Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 2023, v. 38, n. 2. P. 147 1 of 3
Database: Historical Abstracts with Full Text 2 of 3
Authored By: MICHAELSON, GREG 3 of 3
Abstract
Popular accounts of prehistory usually reflect prevailing archaeological understanding. However, cartoons about prehistory are based on a small number of well-established tropes, that seem resistant to new evidence and changing interpretations. In an ongoing study, over 850 cartoons about prehistory, published in Punch between 1841 and 2002, are being interrogated. Of these, 96 concern Stonehenge, an internationally renowned monument, whose origins, purposes, and symbolic status are regularly contested. From expert publication, public dissemination, and educational and popular accounts, it might be expected that Stonehenge cartoons would expose Druid, Bronze Age or Neolithic origins, astronomical, mortuary, religious or ritual use, and wider British exceptionalism. However, while timelessness is a pervasive theme, origins and use are jumbled, and explicit nationalism is rare. Rather, the cartoons offer multiple readings, reflecting recurrent concerns and whims. The cartoons suggest a longstanding disjunction between humour about Stonehenge, and expert debates. This offers opportunities for informed, yet entertaining, interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Archaeological Review from Cambridge. 2023/11, Vol. 38, Issue 2, p147
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Anthropology
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0261-4332
- Accession Number:176159810
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Archaeological Review from Cambridge is the property of Archaeological Review from Cambridge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.