JOURNAL ARTICLE

Normalization of kinship relations to enrich family network analysis: case study on China biographical database.

  • Published In: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2024, v. 39, n. 1. P. 215 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Li, Bin; Yuan, Yiguo; Lu, Xuehui; Bol, Peter K 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on normalizing complex kinship relations in pre-modern Chinese historical data to enable accurate family network construction and analysis. Using the China Biographical Database (CBDB), which contains over 484,000 kinship instances expressed by more than 400 kinship words, the authors propose reducing these diverse kinship terms to three basic relations—father–descendant, mother–descendant, and husband–wife—along with gender information. Through normalization, error detection, correction, and logical inference, they identified 178,390 basic kinship relations, inferred 5,805 missing persons, and generated 29,423 family trees, allowing quantitative analysis of family sizes, depths, remarriage patterns, and inter-family marriages in ancient China. The study demonstrates that such normalization is essential for constructing coherent family networks from historical kinship data and facilitates deeper historical and social research.

Additional Information

  • Source:Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 2024/04, Vol. 39, Issue 1, p215
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Anthropology
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:2055-768X
  • DOI:10.1093/llc/fqad108
  • Accession Number:176806364
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.