Back

Letter to the Editor — NSC‐ADID position statement on consensus‐based laboratory standards, accreditation and individual certification.

  • Published In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2025, v. 70, n. 2. P. 813 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Corbett, Michael R.; Farrell, Laurel J.; Johnson, Robert D.; Jones, Sabra R.; Limoges, Jennifer F. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the position statement of the Alcohol, Drugs and Impairment Division (ADID) of the National Safety Council (NSC) on consensus-based laboratory standards, accreditation, and individual certification in forensic toxicology. The NSC-ADID recommends adopting consensus-based standards, obtaining laboratory accreditation, and supporting certification of individuals to enhance consistency, quality, and accountability in forensic services. The article emphasizes the importance of properly resourcing forensic toxicology service providers to achieve these objectives and improve safety and performance in various settings. The implementation of these standards aims to meet recommendations for improving forensic science, ensuring quality testing and testimony, and guiding policy decisions related to alcohol, drugs, and impairment. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2025/03, Vol. 70, Issue 2, p813
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Applied Sciences
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0022-1198
  • DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.15692
  • Accession Number:184018619
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Forensic Sciences is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.