JOURNAL ARTICLE
Morphological and molecular systematics of the extant Colobinae Blyth, 1863 (Primates: Cercopithecidae).
Published In: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2024, v. 202, n. 4. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Arenson, Julia L 3 of 3
Abstract
This article focuses on reassessing the phylogenetic relationships and comparative morphology of extant colobine monkeys, a primate subfamily divided into two geographically distinct subtribes: the African Colobina and the Asian Presbytina. By integrating a large molecular dataset with a novel morphological character matrix in total-evidence phylogenetic analyses, the study confirms the reciprocal monophyly of these subtribes, supports Presbytis as sister to other Asian colobines, and identifies Rhinopithecus as sister to the remaining odd-nosed colobines. While African colobines exhibit several reliable skeletal synapomorphies, the Asian presbytinans show greater morphological diversity and fewer unifying skeletal features, likely due to their rapid diversification and historical introgression. The research provides an updated list of morphological traits diagnostic of major clades, offering a foundation for future studies on fossil colobines and improving understanding of colobine evolutionary history.
Additional Information
- Source:Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2024/12, Vol. 202, Issue 4, p1
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Biology
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0024-4082
- DOI:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae152
- Accession Number:182905104
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.