JOURNAL ARTICLE

Passive revegetation limited by seed availability in a salt marsh sediment addition site.

  • Published In: Restoration Ecology, 2025, v. 33, n. 1. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Richardson, Parker; Whitcraft, Christine R.; Thorson, Brian 3 of 3

Abstract

Many approaches to restoring salt marsh habitats assume flora will naturally colonize the restoration site following the reinstatement of tidal hydrology that is appropriate for halophytes. However, this passive strategy can fail to meet restoration targets because of unfavorable site conditions and/or limited propagule dispersal. This study analyzes propagule availability in a restored southern California salt marsh that experienced slow passive revegetation following sediment addition to combat subsidence‐driven habitat loss. We performed a seedling emergence experiment to assess the quantity and species composition of viable halophyte seeds in the restoration site compared to nearby established salt marsh habitat. Additionally, we irrigated seed bank samples with freshwater or saltwater to test the effects of restoration site salinity conditions on seedling emergence and survival. Due to the proximity of the restoration site to seed sources, we expected to find ample seeds within its seed bank. However, only two seedlings emerged from restoration site seed bank samples (collected over 1.18 m2 of soil surface area), compared to an average of 44.33 seedlings from control site samples. Control site samples receiving saltwater irrigation had similar quantities of seedlings emerge, but seedlings in salt water had a reduced survival rate compared to seedlings in the freshwater treatment. Overall, these results suggest that passive restoration should be paired with techniques that retain seeds, such as increasing the topographic complexity of the restoration site. However, in scenarios where salinity or elevation may limit seedling recruitment, active planting should be considered to speed restoration trajectories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Restoration Ecology. 2025/01, Vol. 33, Issue 1, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Botany
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1061-2971
  • DOI:10.1111/rec.14285
  • Accession Number:183853973
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Restoration Ecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.