JOURNAL ARTICLE
Body size as a magic trait in two plant-feeding insect species.
Published In: Evolution, 2023, v. 77, n. 2. P. 437 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Glover, Ashleigh N; Bendall, Emily E; Terbot, John W; Payne, Nicole; Webb, Avery; Filbeck, Ashley; Norman, Gavin; Linnen, Catherine R 3 of 3
Abstract
This article investigates body size as a "magic trait"—a trait under divergent selection that also contributes to assortative mating—in two sympatric pine-feeding sawfly species, *Neodiprion lecontei* and *Neodiprion pinetum*. The study finds that body size differences correspond with host pine needle thickness, with *N. lecontei* (using thicker-needled pines) being larger than *N. pinetum* (using thin-needled white pine), and that egg size is under divergent selection related to host needle width. Mating assays demonstrate strong size-assortative mating within and between species, contributing to variable prezygotic reproductive isolation that correlates with body size differences. These findings support body size as a magic trait facilitating speciation-with-gene-flow in these sawflies and suggest that similar mechanisms may be common in plant-feeding insects, though further genetic and ecological studies are needed to confirm pleiotropy and assess the relative importance of body size among reproductive barriers.
Additional Information
- Source:Evolution. 2023/02, Vol. 77, Issue 2, p437
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Botany
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0014-3820
- DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpac053
- Accession Number:164203002
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Evolution is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.