JOURNAL ARTICLE
Managers and Executives Disagree on AI—and It’s Costing Companies.
Published In: Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2026. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Korst, Jeremy; Puntoni, Stefano; Tambe, Prasanna 3 of 3
Abstract
The article focuses on the disconnect between senior executives and middle managers regarding AI adoption in large U.S. companies, highlighting how this divide is hindering the realization of AI’s full business value. While executives tend to be optimistic about AI’s returns and pace of adoption, middle managers—who are responsible for implementing AI in day-to-day operations—are more cautious and report lower perceived ROI. This gap stems from differing roles, time horizons, and experiences with AI’s current limitations. The authors recommend five concrete actions for leadership to bridge this divide, including diagnosing organizational readiness, co-creating AI strategies with managers, reducing managerial workload before adding AI responsibilities, measuring readiness beyond adoption, and fostering upward feedback to align expectations and improve implementation. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Harvard Business Review Digital Articles. 2026/04, p1
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Business and Management
- Publication Date:2026
- Accession Number:192913819
- Copyright Statement:Copyright 2026 Harvard Business Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Additional restrictions may apply including the use of this content as assigned course material. Please consult your institution's librarian about any restrictions that might apply under the license with your institution. For more information and teaching resources from Harvard Business Publishing including Harvard Business School Cases, eLearning products, and business simulations please visit hbsp.harvard.edu. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.