JOURNAL ARTICLE
Computational Reproducibility in Finance: Evidence from 1,000 Tests.
Published In: Review of Financial Studies, 2024, v. 37, n. 11. P. 3558 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Pérignon, Christophe; Akmansoy, Olivier; Hurlin, Christophe; Dreber, Anna; Holzmeister, Felix; Huber, Jürgen; Johannesson, Magnus; Kirchler, Michael; Menkveld, Albert J; Razen, Michael; Weitzel, Utz 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the computational reproducibility of 1,008 empirical results addressing six finance research questions, analyzed by 168 research teams in the Finance Crowd Analysis Project (#fincap). It finds that exact reproduction of results by running original code on the same data occurs only 52% of the time, with reproducibility positively associated with researchers’ coding skills and effort, and negatively associated with technical complexity, code complexity, and outlier results. Researchers tend to overestimate the reproducibility and underestimate the difficulty of reproducing their own work. The study identifies common barriers to reproducibility—including bugs, insufficient documentation, and computational constraints—and offers practical guidelines for researchers and discusses policy options for academic journals to improve reproducibility standards in finance research.
Additional Information
- Source:Review of Financial Studies. 2024/11, Vol. 37, Issue 11, p3558
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Business and Management
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0893-9454
- DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhae029
- Accession Number:180336219
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Review of Financial Studies is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.