JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quantitative Easing in Japan: A critical evaluation.

  • Published In: Competition & Change, 2025, v. 29, n. 5. P. 656 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Carment, Luciano 3 of 3

Abstract

This article examines the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) Quantitative Easing (QE) program initiated in 2013, focusing on why it has persisted despite largely negative empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness in achieving key macroeconomic goals like sustained inflation and GDP growth. It highlights that while traditional critiques emphasize transmission mechanism failures and structural challenges such as Japan’s “balance sheet recession,” the program has become institutionally entrenched, effectively positioning the BoJ as a market-maker of last resort that supports asset prices and liquidity in Japanese financial markets. Drawing on critical macro finance (CMF) theory, the article argues that QE has evolved into a de facto standing facility underpinning certain asset classes, complicating efforts to normalize monetary policy amid growing interest rate differentials with the U.S. Federal Reserve. This case illustrates the complexities central banks face in transitioning from bank-based to market-based financial systems and the structural implications of prolonged unconventional monetary policies.

Additional Information

  • Source:Competition & Change. 2025/10, Vol. 29, Issue 5, p656
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Business and Management
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1024-5294
  • DOI:10.1177/10245294251352740
  • Accession Number:188178380
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Competition & Change is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.