JOURNAL ARTICLE

Save the kids: The need for regulation of cryptocurrency to protect adolescents from fraud.

  • Published In: Family Court Review, 2023, v. 61, n. 3. P. 650 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Ryan, Evan 3 of 3

Abstract

Cryptocurrency has become the new hot investment for young investors. Everyone wants to get in on the next cryptocurrency bubble, and there are those that want to exploit this excitement and exploit children. Influencers who have young audiences are pushing cryptocurrency investments onto their audiences and not fully educating them on the risks. To avoid this exploitation, The Securities and Exchange Commission should actively regulate decentralized exchanges where children purchase cryptocurrency, put age limit regulations into place, and require know your customer systems to verify that minors are not purchasing cryptocurrency without the consent of a guardian. Key Points for the Family Court Community: Adolescents are susceptible to cryptocurrency scams due to the link between adolescence, risk taking, and the risk found in trading cryptocurrency.Regulation of decentralized exchanges is needed, as they are places where children can purchase cryptocurrency as minors.Currently, there is no controlling legislation or regulatory authority with the necessary power to solve the problem.Age verification systems need to be mandatory for all cryptocurrency trades, and all exchanges should have mandatory Know Your Customer systems.The Securities and Exchange Commission should mandate that if a minor is going to purchase cryptocurrency, they should have a custodial account that can only be loaded with funds from the custodian of the account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Family Court Review. 2023/07, Vol. 61, Issue 3, p650
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Business and Management
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:1531-2445
  • DOI:10.1111/fcre.12729
  • Accession Number:164914741
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Family Court Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.