JOURNAL ARTICLE

Findings from California State University in Psychology Reported (Human Reproductive Cloning: Possible Psychological Consequences).

  • Published In: Psychology & Psychiatry Journal, 2025. P. 567 1 of 2

  • Database: Psychology Source 2 of 2

Abstract

The article discusses new research on the psychological implications of human reproductive cloning (HRC), particularly in light of the debates sparked by the cloning of Dolly the lamb in 1996. The research, conducted by California State University, argues that many criticisms of HRC are based on speculation rather than empirical evidence, particularly overlooking the experiences of monozygotic (MZ) twins, who are natural clones. The paper posits that if HRC is proven safe and cost-effective, it could serve as a viable alternative to assisted reproductive technology (ART) and adoption for childless individuals and couples. However, the research also acknowledges that challenges to the arguments against HRC do not necessarily support its implementation due to ongoing health, safety, and ethical concerns. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Psychology & Psychiatry Journal. 2025/08, p567
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Business and Management
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1944-2718
  • Accession Number:187475668
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Psychology & Psychiatry Journal is the property of NewsRx and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.