THE GREAT AID HYPOCRISY.
Published In: Foreign Policy, 2025, n. 258. P. 36 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: TOOZE, ADAM 3 of 3
Abstract
The article critiques the West's development model, particularly highlighting the United States' recent rejection of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its implications for global development. It discusses how the U.S. position reflects a broader geopolitical critique, particularly towards China's development strategies, and questions the effectiveness of the SDGs, suggesting they may have been more about the self-interest of global elites than genuine progress. The author argues that development is inherently political and that the current global landscape requires a reevaluation of development strategies, emphasizing the need for practical alternatives that recognize the complexities of power dynamics and resource management. The piece concludes that a realistic approach to development must prioritize immediate humanitarian needs while also addressing the political realities of global power shifts. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Foreign Policy. 2025/10, Issue 258, p36
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Business and Management
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0015-7228
- Accession Number:187632091
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Foreign Policy is the property of Foreign Policy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.