JOURNAL ARTICLE

Bad stats: A regular series exploring slip-ups, snafus and salutary lessons from the world of statistics.

  • Published In: Significance, 2024, v. 21, n. 5. P. 42 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Hanley, James 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the concept of "immortal time bias," a statistical error that can lead to misleading conclusions about factors that influence longevity. The author uses the example of a study that claimed sunbathers live six years longer, which was later debunked as a result of immortal time bias. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing this bias in research, and suggests strategies for avoiding it, such as using simulated data and involving statisticians in research groups. The author also highlights the role of journalists, reviewers, and editors in preventing the spread of misleading information. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Significance. 2024/11, Vol. 21, Issue 5, p42
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Business and Management
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1740-9705
  • DOI:10.1093/jrssig/qmae079
  • Accession Number:180267777
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Significance is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.