JOURNAL ARTICLE

commentary Do Emergency Savings Programs Work and What Is in It for the Employer?

  • Published In: Journal of Retirement, 2025, v. 13, n. 2. P. 113 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Hammond, Brett; Webb, Anthony 3 of 3

Abstract

The article examines the impact of employer-sponsored emergency savings programs, specifically Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts (PLESAs) introduced under Section 127 of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, which allow non-highly compensated employees to contribute post-tax funds to principal-protected short-term savings within retirement plans. While these programs aim to reduce reliance on high-interest credit and prevent tapping into retirement funds during emergencies, concerns exist regarding their complexity, lack of employer matching, investment restrictions, and potential suboptimal use due to mental accounting. The article also discusses the uncertain benefits of PLESAs for workers and employers, noting limited but emerging evidence of positive workplace outcomes, and emphasizes the importance of thoughtful program design, including contribution defaults and choice architecture, to enhance effectiveness.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Retirement. 2025/10, Vol. 13, Issue 2, p113
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Business and Management
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:2326-6899
  • DOI:10.3905/jor.2025.1.191
  • Accession Number:189370984

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.