JOURNAL ARTICLE
Drastic Econometric Failures and Theoretical Pitfalls in French's Method of Day-of-the-Week Anomaly Detection.
Published In: Journal of Investing, 2026, v. 35, n. 2. P. 56 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Raeisi Sarkandiz, Mostafa; Ghayekhloo, Sara; Raeisi, Amir Reza 3 of 3
Abstract
Stock market anomalies, such as calendar effects and price bubbles, are events that cannot be explained by the famous efficient market hypothesis and have always attracted the attention of economists and statisticians. In this regard, in 1980, Professor Kenneth French published a pioneer study on calendar anomalies focusing on the day-of-the-week effect (French 1980). The novelty and easy-to-use aspects of his approach made it the benchmark model for studying such events in financial markets all around the world. However, its fame and practicality hide the model's serious econometrical failures and theoretical pitfalls. The present study attempts to criticize French's model from a technical point of view and then tries to introduce an alternative approach to studying such phenomena. The advantages of the new method, which is called mean/median analysis, and the failures of French's model are illustrated through an empirical investigation of the daily yields of US 10-year Treasury bonds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Investing. 2026/02, Vol. 35, Issue 2, p56
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Business and Management
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:1068-0896
- DOI:10.3905/joi.2025.1.378
- Accession Number:191616184
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Investing is the property of With Intelligence Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.