After a Merger, These 3 Inefficiencies Can Actually Be Assets.

This article discusses the counterintuitive idea that inefficiencies in the post-merger integration process can actually be beneficial for corporate growth. The author presents three specific inefficiencies: mirror teams, double incentives, and co-location. Mirror teams involve assigning managers and employees from both the acquiring and acquired companies to work together, which can help build trust and facilitate collaboration. Double incentives refer to adding new rewards after a merger to encourage teamwork, align goals, and decrease reluctance to collaborate. Co-location, or frequent in-person meetings between managers from both companies, helps build personal connections, facilitate communication, and build trust. Despite being inefficient in terms of cost and time, these inefficiencies can lead to better outcomes in the long run. [Extracted from the article]