JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Fallacy of Hyaluronic Acid Binding a Thousand Times its Weight in Water.

  • Published In: Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2024, v. 75, n. 1. P. 37 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: BORCHERS, SCOTT; PIRRUNG, MICHAEL C. 3 of 3

Abstract

This study re-examined experimental reports and past literature of water binding by the humectant hyaluronic acid, in comparison with another common humectant, glycerol, to critically evaluate the common claim that hyaluronic acid binds a thousand times its weight in water, making it especially suited to be a cosmetic moisturizer. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to study aqueous solutions of glycerol and hyaluronic acid. A 0.1 weight % aqueous solution of hyaluronic acid (the putative 1,000 times its weight) is a clear, flowing liquid, comparable to a 10 weight % aqueous solution of glycerol. The melting point and melting heat of fusion of the hyaluronic acid solution were indistinguishable from pure water, while both were reduced for the glycerol solution. This is as expected, as colligative properties of aqueous solutions are proportional to concentration, and the polymer is at a much lower molar concentration than glycerol. There is imperceptible freezing point depression by hyaluronic acid, whereas that by glycerol is as expected. No experimental evidence was found for any special ability of hyaluronic acid to bind water at the claimed level of a thousand times by weight. The origin of the fallacy that it binds water at that level can be traced to older literature that has been misunderstood for the meaning of binding, as compared to other physical properties such as hydrodynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2024/01, Vol. 75, Issue 1, p37
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Chemistry
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1525-7886
  • Accession Number:177272391
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Cosmetic Science is the property of Society of Cosmetic Chemists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.