JOURNAL ARTICLE
Informative Paragraph Writing in Students With Language-Based Learning Disabilities: Comparing Measures Across Two Different Prompts.
Published In: Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2026, v. 47, n. 3. P. 123 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Koutsoftas, Anthony D.; Puranik, Cynthia 3 of 3
Abstract
This article focuses on an exploratory study comparing written language measures from two different informative paragraph prompts in U.S. fourth- and fifth-grade students with language-based learning disabilities (LLD). Using a scaffolded elicitation task, students composed paragraphs about either an animal in the wild or a favorite game, sport, or hobby, with no significant differences found in writing productivity, complexity, accuracy, or quality between prompts at two time points (fall and spring). However, correlations between oral language ability, measured by the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fifth Edition (CELF-5) Core Language Score, and writing measures were significant only for the favorite game, sport, or hobby prompt. The study suggests that either prompt can be effectively used by clinicians to elicit representative informative writing samples from students with LLD, and that scaffolded writing tasks may support these students’ written language production.
Additional Information
- Source:Communication Disorders Quarterly. 2026/05, Vol. 47, Issue 3, p123
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Communication and Mass Media
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:1525-7401
- DOI:10.1177/15257401251337736
- Accession Number:193059402
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Communication Disorders Quarterly is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.