JOURNAL ARTICLE

antiepistemology of organized abuse: Ignorance, exploitation, inaction.

  • Published In: British Journal of Criminology, 2023, v. 63, n. 1. P. 221 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Salter, Michael; Woodlock, Delanie 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the role of organized abuse—defined as sexual abuse involving multiple adults abusing multiple children—in the production of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and the pervasive ignorance surrounding it. Based on an international survey of 74 adult survivors of organized abuse, the study highlights how familial and extra-familial networks facilitate abuse and CSAM production, while victims face significant barriers to disclosure due to threats, shame, and institutional disbelief. The authors argue that ignorance of organized abuse is maintained through social, institutional, and epistemological mechanisms that hinder recognition, investigation, and support for survivors. They advocate for acknowledging organized abuse as a legitimate subject of criminological inquiry and for developing trauma-informed policies and practices that incorporate survivor knowledge to better address the complexities of CSAM and child sexual exploitation.

Additional Information

  • Source:British Journal of Criminology. 2023/01, Vol. 63, Issue 1, p221
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Communication and Mass Media
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0007-0955
  • DOI:10.1093/bjc/azac007
  • Accession Number:160901951
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of British Journal of Criminology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.