JOURNAL ARTICLE
Making Amends to the Dead: Reparative Ethos in Veteran Expressions of Survivor's Guilt.
Published In: Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 2026, v. 9, n. 1. P. 33 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Rhidenour, Kayla; Mack, Robert L.; Cole, Kristen L. 3 of 3
Abstract
Survivor's guilt haunts countless veterans, yet little research examines how veterans rhetorically process this experience. This study analyzes poetry from post- 9/11 veterans to identify a distinct rhetorical mode we term reparative ethos. While existing Mental Health Rhetoric Research (MHRR) has identified and extensively explored recuperative ethos--strategies used to restore credibility in the face of externally imposed stigma-- we propose that some veterans may also engage in what we call reparative ethos. Unlike recuperative ethos, which addresses externally imposed stigma through appeals to living audiences, reparative ethos emerges from self-avowed feelings of culpability and aims to make amends to internalized representations of lost comrades. Drawing on Melanie Klein's object relations theory and Mental Health Rhetoric Research (MHRR), we analyze poems from Warrior Writers anthologies that explicitly address survivor's guilt. Our analysis reveals that veterans engage in narrative acts of reparation directed toward deceased others, addressing both the loss of external relationships and threats to internalized military ethos. This research extends MHRR by demonstrating how trauma can generate inward- facing rhetorical strategies focused on healing rather than persuasion, offering new frameworks for understanding veteran mental healthcare and creative expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Rhetoric of Health & Medicine. 2026/01, Vol. 9, Issue 1, p33
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Communication and Mass Media
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:2573-5055
- DOI:10.5744/rhm.2026.2982
- Accession Number:191683270
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Rhetoric of Health & Medicine is the property of University of Florida, Board of Trustees and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.