JOURNAL ARTICLE

Understanding Research Frameworks: A Conceptual Synthesis and Typology Across Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research.

  • Published In: International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2025, v. 17, n. 2. P. 52 1 of 3

  • Database: CINAHL Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Leech, Nancy L. 3 of 3

Abstract

The use of frameworks in research has a long and complex history; yet, their role remains widely misunderstood, particularly among students, novice researchers, and even experienced researchers and authors. The English word "framework" can be traced back to the late 16th century, wherein it referred to a physical structure for support or enclosure. Over time, its meaning broadened to include abstract systems of organization, paving the way for its adoption in research discourse. In contemporary contexts, frameworks are central to research across disciplines, providing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical scaffolds that shape inquiry from design to dissemination. Despite their ubiquity, frameworks often are misapplied or superficially referenced, leading to incoherent designs and weak integration of research elements. This problem is compounded by the lack of clear and comprehensive guidance in the methodological literature, coupled with inconsistent terminology across fields. In this article, we respond to this gap by first outlining the origins and uses of the term "framework," then tracing the historical and contemporary role of frameworks in research. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of 23 distinct types of research frameworks, situating them within broader scholarly discourse and organizing them into six overarching families that clarify their functions across qualitative research, quantitative research, and mixed methods research traditions. We argue for the special importance of frameworks in mixed methods research, wherein integration requires conceptual coherence, and demonstrate how different framework types operate across research traditions to support design, analysis, interpretation, legitimation, and cumulative knowledge building. By offering a systematic typology, comparative synthesis, and guiding structure for classification, this article seeks to provide scholars, students, and reviewers with a shared conceptual vocabulary for understanding the diverse origins, purposes, and applications of research frameworks. By offering a comprehensive synthesis, exemplars, and guidance, we aim to demystify frameworks, to promote reflexive and coherent usage, and to strengthen methodological clarity and integration across research traditions.

Additional Information

  • Source:International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. 2025/05, Vol. 17, Issue 2, p52
  • Document Type:Journal Article
  • Subject Area:Communication and Mass Media
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1834-0806
  • DOI:10.29034/ijmra.v17n2a1
  • Accession Number:193549078

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.