JOURNAL ARTICLE
Radiopaque marker impression and 3D Boolean inversion for metal artifact-distorted same-day implant planning: a digital workflow.
Published In: International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 2025, v. 28, n. 3. P. 283 1 of 3
Database: Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source 2 of 3
Authored By: Chunxu Liu; In Meei Tew; Xin-Fang Leong; Mohd-Said, Shahida 3 of 3
Abstract
The article presents a novel digital workflow for computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) that addresses the challenge of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) metal artifacts by using a 3D-printed radiopaque impression tray combined with 3D Boolean inversion for same-day implant planning. This method eliminates the need for fabricating a traditional radiographic template, reducing patient visits and improving the trueness of 3D data alignment compared to the conventional double-scan technique. The workflow was validated in vitro on a 3D-printed model with metal liners, demonstrating higher accuracy in implant planning despite the presence of metal artifacts. The study suggests further in vivo research to confirm clinical applicability and highlights the potential advantages of this approach in improving guided implant surgery efficiency and precision.
Additional Information
- Source:International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2025/07, Vol. 28, Issue 3, p283
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Computer Science
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:1463-4201
- DOI:10.3290/j.ijcd.b6429781
- Accession Number:187829412
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of International Journal of Computerized Dentistry is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.