JOURNAL ARTICLE
Prevalence of Pre-Treatment Sarcopenia in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Lymphoma.
Published In: Acta Haematologica, 2026, v. 149, n. 2. P. 187 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Grønset, Charlotte Nørregaard; Jarden, Mary; Christensen, Jan; Hutchings, Martin; Tolver, Anders; Suetta, Charlotte 3 of 3
Abstract
Introduction: Sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle strength, mass, and performance, presents a significant challenge in cancer care due to its impact on treatment outcomes, quality of life, and survival. This study aimed to assess its prevalence in newly diagnosed lymphoma patients. Methods: Adults planned for first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled and screened for sarcopenia before treatment. Sarcopenia was defined by the European guidelines (EWGSOP2) using low muscle strength (hand-grip), low muscle mass (DXA), and low physical performance (gait speed). Results: Sixty-nine patients (mean age 57, 19 women) were included. Six patients (9%) had low hand-grip strength, 15 (22%) had low muscle mass, and 4 (6%) demonstrated low gait speed. Two patients met the criteria for sarcopenia, with one having severe sarcopenia. Conclusion: Sarcopenia prevalence was 3%, but 22% had low muscle mass, suggesting muscle strength alone may not be an optimal screening tool for lymphoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Acta Haematologica. 2026/03, Vol. 149, Issue 2, p187
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Consumer Health
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0001-5792
- DOI:10.1159/000545358
- Accession Number:192559864
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Acta Haematologica is the property of Karger AG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.