JOURNAL ARTICLE
Clinician compliance to intrapartum antibiotics prophylaxis for minimising neonatal group B streptococcal infection risk.
Published In: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2025, v. 65, n. 3. P. 366 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Mehta, Shailender; Oraekeyi, Roseline Charity; Catalano, Nicole 3 of 3
Abstract
Background: Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) administration to group B streptococcal (GBS) positive pregnant women and other pregnant women with risk factors may reduce the rate of neonatal early‐onset GBS infection (EOGBSI). Aims: Our aims were estimating the current indications for IAP among women presenting in labour, evaluating compliance to the current local IAP guidelines and to provide recommendations for improving clinician compliance. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed IAP data at our tertiary perinatal centre over a 16‐month period. Our cohort included women, positive for GBS (± risk factors for EOGBSI), and a comparable number of randomly selected women with risk factors and GBS status negative or unknown. Results: A total of 424 mother‐baby pairs were included in this study. Forty‐seven percent of the study cohort had IAP indication (n = 202/424). Of these, 72% (n = 145/202) received some form of IAP and 61% (n = 123/202) received 'adequate' IAP. IAP was adequately administered in 67% (n = 99/148) of women positive for GBS, 27% (n = 9/33) of women with unknown GBS status and 71% (n = 15/21) of women negative for GBS with IAP indication. Most frequent reason (30%, n = 125/424) for 'inadequate' IAP was less than four hours from birth for women positive for GBS despite spending more than 60 min in the hospital before birthing. Conclusions: A substantial number of IAP were administered less than four hours before birth and were therefore 'inadequate' according to the current recommendations. These high rates could be reduced if those administered at least two hours prior to birth were redefined as 'adequate'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2025/06, Vol. 65, Issue 3, p366
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Consumer Health
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0004-8666
- DOI:10.1111/ajo.13907
- Accession Number:186809695
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.