JOURNAL ARTICLE

Best practice: quality assessment outcomes of the Practice Enhancement Program among family physicians in Saskatchewan, Canada.

  • Published In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2024, v. 36, n. 1. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Macaskill, James; Bryce, Rhonda; Muller, Andries 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the evaluation of quality concerns among family physicians in Saskatchewan, Canada, based on assessments from the Practice Enhancement Program (PEP) conducted between 1997 and 2020. The study found that 20.8% of assessments identified quality concerns related to care, medical records, or facility standards, with a significant increase in concerns during 2015–2020. Factors associated with these concerns included international medical training, urban practice location, solo practice, male gender, and increasing physician age. Recommendations commonly addressed documentation, chronic disease management, patient profiles, laboratory investigations, medications, and emergency preparedness. The findings highlight the need for targeted support and interventions to improve primary care quality, particularly for internationally trained, urban, older, and solo-practicing physicians.

Additional Information

  • Source:International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2024/01, Vol. 36, Issue 1, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Consumer Health
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1353-4505
  • DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzad108
  • Accession Number:176511488
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of International Journal for Quality in Health Care is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.