JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparative evaluation of ultrasound and frozen section analysis in predicting margin status after breast conservation surgery in patients with ultrasound-detectable breast cancer.

  • Published In: Tropical Doctor, 2026, v. 56, n. 1. P. 48 1 of 3

  • Database: CINAHL Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Anto, Jijo; Paswan, Shiv Shankar; Jha, Chandan Kumar; Sinha, Upasna; Bharti, Shreekant; Bhadani, Punam Prasad 3 of 3

Abstract

This article evaluates the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound (US) and frozen section (FS) analysis in predicting margin status during breast conservation surgery (BCS) for patients with ultrasound-detectable breast carcinoma. In a prospective study of 54 patients, FS demonstrated higher patient-wise sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (100%) compared to US, though US showed comparable margin-wise NPV (99.3%) and accuracy (94.7%). Both modalities had relatively low positive predictive values, indicating higher false positive rates. The study concludes that US, being rapid, widely available, and cost-effective, can be successfully used for margin assessment in BCS, especially in settings where FS may be less accessible or more time-consuming.

Additional Information

  • Source:Tropical Doctor. 2026/01, Vol. 56, Issue 1, p48
  • Document Type:Journal Article
  • Subject Area:Consumer Health
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:0049-4755
  • DOI:10.1177/00494755251374479
  • Accession Number:189753530

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.