JOURNAL ARTICLE

"From god astraye went": William Forrest's Contra-Reformation "Legend of Theophilus".

  • Published In: Studies in Philology, 2024, v. 121, n. 1. P. 58 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Wort, Oliver 3 of 3

Abstract

This is a study of William Forrest's "Legend of Theophilus." In the history of devil-compact literature, Theophilus was the ur-Faustus, the preeminent example all across medieval Europe of the foolish man who, for worldly gain, abandoned his soul to the devil. Finished on 27 October 1572, Forrest's version of this tale is a rare example of an English Theophilus legend written in the aftermath of the Reformation rather than in advance of it. This novel context permits Forrest to treat the legend as a critique of Reformation and a defense of Catholic devotion, particularly to the Virgin Mary. Furthermore, as an Elizabethan study in damnation and redemption, Forrest's poem is comparable to Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus , though the two are products of fundamentally different religious milieus. This study ends by reading Forrest's atypical Elizabethan poem alongside Marlowe's more quintessentially Elizabethan play in order to draw out what is most distinctive about both works and the divine economies that animate them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Studies in Philology. 2024/01, Vol. 121, Issue 1, p58
  • Document Type:Literary Criticism
  • Subject Area:Drama and Theater Arts
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0039-3738
  • DOI:10.1353/sip.2024.a919343
  • Accession Number:175498752
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Studies in Philology is the property of University of North Carolina Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.