JOURNAL ARTICLE

Secondary Amazon rainforest partially recovers tree cavities suitable for nesting birds in 18–34 years.

  • Published In: Ornithological Applications, 2024, v. 126, n. 3. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Oliveira, Carine Dantas; Cornelius, Cintia; Stouffer, Philip C; Cockle, Kristina L 3 of 3

Abstract

This article investigates the restoration of tree cavities suitable for cavity-nesting birds in secondary forests undergoing passive succession in the central Amazon, Brazil, at the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP). The study found that cavity abundance increases with forest age but remains lower in 31–34-year-old secondary forests compared to old-growth forests, which have a higher density and greater diversity of cavity characteristics, including larger, deeper, and higher cavities important for large-bodied bird species. Land-use history (cutting only versus cutting and burning) did not significantly affect cavity availability. The findings suggest that several decades are needed for secondary forests to develop sufficient cavity resources to support diverse cavity-nesting bird communities, highlighting the importance of retaining legacy trees and old-growth patches to facilitate earlier recolonization.

Additional Information

  • Source:Ornithological Applications. 2024/08, Vol. 126, Issue 3, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:2732-4621
  • DOI:10.1093/ornithapp/duae008
  • Accession Number:179665295
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Ornithological Applications is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.