Soft tissue response to titanium healing abutments treated by Er: YAG laser or plasma spray: A randomized controlled feasibility clinical study with SEM and histological analysis.

Objective: Soft tissue seal around implants ensures stable osseointegration and a long‐term survival of dental implants. Different surface modification and decontamination for implant abutments were endorsed in order to improve peri‐implant soft tissue healing, such as laser, plasma spray, acid etching, and steaming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of peri‐implant soft tissue to titanium abutments treated with Erbium‐doped: Yttrium‐Aluminum‐Garnet (Er:YAG) laser versus plasma spray. Methods: Twenty‐four patients who required implant placement in the maxillary arch participated in this study. Patients were divided into three groups, abutments treated with Er:YAG laser versus cold plasma spray and untreated abutments. Fourteen days following the implant abutment insertion, soft tissue peri‐implant biopsies were taken for histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical evaluation. Scanning electron microscopy was done for the abutments; plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed 14 days and 3 months following final restoration. Results: Regarding the histological results, the least mean inflammatory cell count was in the plasma group (174.09 ± 40.67), followed by the laser group (654.27 ± 85.95) and the control group (852.00 ± 117.98), with statistically significant differences between them. The mean area fraction of collagen fibers showed the highest value in the plasma group (9.73 ± 1.91), followed by the laser group (3.25 ± 0.49), while the lowest value was found in the control group (1.17 ± 0.51). The immunohistochemical expression of E‐cadherin was significantly higher and uniformly distributed in the plasma group (42.4 ± 11.2%) followed by the laser group (15.4 ± 4.07%) and the control group (6.8 ± 1.7%). SEM analysis of healing abutments showed fibroblast‐like cells, which were more developed with dense fibers in the plasma group; laser group fibers showed fewer and more delicate fibers than the plasma group, while no fibers were detected in the control group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this feasibility study, the present data concluded that plasma spray and Erbium: YAG laser can be used for abutment surface treatment to achieve better peri‐implant soft tissue healing. Clinically and histologically, plasma spray showed a better effect on the peri‐implant soft tissues by reducing the inflammatory reaction, promoting collagen fiber formation, higher fibroblast‐like cell attachment, and upregulating E‐cadherin expression than Erbium: YAG laser and control groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]