JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluating high-resolution global NWP model day-1 precipitation forecasts for the Indian monsoon: Potential to use in real-time applications.

  • Published In: Journal of Earth System Science, 2025, v. 134, n. 4. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Reddy, Mannem Venkatarami; Mitra, Ashis K; Kumar, Kondapalli Niranjan; Amarjyothi, K; Momin, I M; Seela, Balaji Kumar; Mukhopadhyay, P; Ashrit, Raghavendra; Mohandas, Saji; Prasad, V. S. 3 of 3

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether the current state of high-resolution operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) model forecasts has advanced to a level where they could supplant satellite-based precipitation estimates for real-time applications. Recent advancements in data assimilation, model physics, and computing power have enabled short-term NWP model forecasts to compete with satellite-based rainfall estimates, offering the added benefit of a high spatial and temporal resolution. This study evaluates the 24 hr rainfall forecast of three global NWP models: (i) the NCUM (National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) Unified Model), (ii) the UKMO (United Kingdom (UK) Met Office (UKMO) model), and (iii) the IMD-GFS (Indian Meteorological Department (IMD)-Global Forecast System (GFS)) model along with the MEPS (multi-model ensemble predicted system) and two satellite precipitation products (IMERG: Integrated multi-satellite retrievals for global precipitation measurement and GSMaP: Global satellite mapping of precipitation) against the IMD gauge gridded observations for the 2016–2023 summer monsoon seasons at a daily scale. The findings indicate that 24 hr model forecasts are comparable to those of satellite-based products. In certain scenarios, these forecasts exhibited a better performance in capturing spatiotemporal variations and detecting precipitation, albeit with a slightly higher rate of false alarms at lower thresholds. The NCUM and UKMO models exhibit approximately similar forecast skills, yet are marginally better than the GFS model. However, MEPS shows a good prediction of spatiotemporal variation but struggles with weak precipitation overestimation and high-intensity precipitation underestimation. This indicates that a simple average of the multi-model product does not enhance rainfall frequency or magnitude prediction. GSMaP shows a limited ability to detect monsoon rainfall, whereas IMERG performs moderately better but consistently overestimates at all rainfall thresholds. These findings provide valuable insights for incorporating forecasted precipitation estimates into day-to-day weather monitoring over the Indian monsoon areas, serving as a useful reference for precipitation retrieval algorithms for future generations. Research highlights: This study, for the first time, comprehensively evaluates the long-term (2016–2023) rainfall from three different operational models forecast and two different satellite products against the observed station-based rainfall over India. This study basically tries to establish whether the NWP short forecasts have the potential to replace the satellite-based precipitation estimates. These results are useful for researchers, weather information centres, and developers of operational models and satellite retrieval algorithms for the better usage of short forecasts for day-to-day weather monitoring. This study also has the potential future scope to improve short forecasts from NWP models by various post-processing methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Earth System Science. 2025/12, Vol. 134, Issue 4, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0253-4126
  • DOI:10.1007/s12040-025-02646-7
  • Accession Number:188903294
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Earth System Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.