SHOW US THE MONEY.

  • Published In: National Review, 2025, v. 77, n. 10. P. 53 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: McCarthy, Andrew C. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on the evolving landscape of college sports and the implications of recent legal rulings regarding athlete compensation. It discusses the Supreme Court's 2021 decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, which challenged the NCAA's long-standing amateurism model by invalidating restrictions on educational benefits for college athletes. The ruling has led to significant changes, including the introduction of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation, allowing athletes to profit from endorsements. The article also highlights ongoing legal and legislative challenges, particularly concerning equity under Title IX and the potential for collective bargaining among athletes, as the NCAA navigates a complex and rapidly changing environment in collegiate athletics. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:National Review. 2025/10, Vol. 77, Issue 10, p53
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Economics
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0028-0038
  • Accession Number:187450843
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of National Review is the property of National Review Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.