A systems science leverage point analysis of climate change advocacy.

This article examines the types of demands made by Australian climate advocacy groups through the lens of the Intervention Level Framework (ILF), a systems science tool used in public health to identify leverage points for systemic change. Analyzing 131 demands from 35 organizations, the study finds that most demands focus on lower-leverage structural elements, such as specific projects or subsidies, rather than on higher-leverage points like system structures, goals, or paradigms that could drive more transformative change. The research also highlights a narrow range of topics addressed, with limited attention to sectors like transport and food systems, despite their significant climate impact. The authors suggest that applying the ILF could help climate advocacy groups develop more consistent and impactful demands by targeting underutilized leverage points, potentially enhancing their effectiveness in influencing government policy and systemic climate action.