JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sustainable urban farming using a two‐phase multi‐objective and multi‐criteria decision‐making approach.

  • Published In: International Transactions in Operational Research, 2025, v. 32, n. 2. P. 769 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Haloui, Doha; Oufaska, Kenza; Oudani, Mustapha; Yassini, Khalid El; Belhadi, Amine; Kamble, Sachin 3 of 3

Abstract

For several reasons, recent attention has focused on urban agriculture in the context of sustainable and smart agriculture. Most of the global population has relocated from rural to urban areas. The ecological impact of agriculture is a rising concern. Furthermore, food insecurity, particularly food availability, remains a significant issue. Satisfying rising food demand with minimal environmental impact is a significant barrier to more sustainable food production. In this article, we study a sustainable location for urban farming that optimally balances economic and environmental objectives. We formulate the problem as a multi‐objective linear program that considers maximizing the ecological benefit and crop production yield and minimizing transportation cost, sensor cost, and CO2 emissions. The proposed mathematical model is then solved using a two‐phase method. The first phase uses several multi‐objective optimization (MOO) methods (weighted sum, epsilon‐constraint, augmented epsilon) to generate a pool of compromise solutions. The second phase uses multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) methods (MARCOS, VIKOR, and Possibility Degree) to rank compromise solutions. We performed a sensitivity analysis first by studying the effect of different criteria weights (balanced, environmentally, and economically oriented) and then by investigating the rank reversal. Furthermore, we developed a thorough validity test that examines the impact of the dynamic elements of rank reversal by changing the importance of the model's input parameters. To provide a fusion ranking of the MCDM rankings, we devised an aggregated ranking approach using the half‐quadratic (HQ) method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:International Transactions in Operational Research. 2025/03, Vol. 32, Issue 2, p769
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Economics
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0969-6016
  • DOI:10.1111/itor.13460
  • Accession Number:180069203
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of International Transactions in Operational Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.