JOURNAL ARTICLE

Merit‐based incentive payment system participation and after‐hours documentation among US office‐based physicians: Findings from the 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey.

  • Published In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2023, v. 29, n. 2. P. 397 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Nguyen, Oliver T.; Turner, Kea; Parekh, Arpan; Alishahi Tabriz, Amir; Hanna, Karim; Merlo, Lisa J.; Hong, Young‐Rock 3 of 3

Abstract

Background: After‐hours documentation burden among US clinicians is often uncompensated work and has been associated with burnout, leading health systems to identify root causes and seek interventions to reduce this. A few studies have suggested quality programme participation (e.g., Merit‐Based Incentive Payment System [MIPS]) was associated with a higher administrative burden. However, the association between MIPS participation and after‐hours documentation has not been fully explored. Thus, this study aims to assess whether participation in the MIPS programme was independently associated with after‐hours documentation burden. Methods: We used 2021 data from the National Electronic Health Records Survey. We used a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model to assess whether MIPS participation was associated with the amount of after‐hours documentation burden when controlling for other factors. We controlled for physician age, specialty, sex, number of practice locations, number of physicians, practice ownership, whether team support (e.g., scribes) is used for documentation tasks, and whether the practice accepts Medicaid patients. Results: We included 1801 office‐based US physician respondents with complete data for variables of interest. After controlling for other factors, MIPS participation was associated with greater odds of spending a greater number of hours on after‐hours documentation (odds ratio = 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.95). Conclusions: MIPS participation may increase after‐hours documentation burden among US office‐based physicians, suggesting that physicians may require additional resources to more efficiently report data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2023/03, Vol. 29, Issue 2, p397
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Economics
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:1356-1294
  • DOI:10.1111/jep.13796
  • Accession Number:161862946
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.