JOURNAL ARTICLE
Economic Consequences of AS 18: Related-Party Transactions with Principals versus Nonprincipals.
Published In: Accounting Review, 2025, v. 100, n. 1. P. 317 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Hope, Ole-Kristian; Lu, Haihao; Peng, Songlan 3 of 3
Abstract
In 2014, the PCAOB adopted a new auditing standard, AS 18 Related Parties, with the intention of enhancing auditors' performance in auditing related-party transactions (RPTs). Using hand-collected data, we find significant reductions in both firms' restatement risk and their engagement in RPTs following the AS 18 adoption. Such reductions are especially pronounced for smaller firms and firms having RPTs with principals, in which related persons in the counterparty of RPTs are the primary beneficiaries, such as CEOs, board chairs, or primary shareholders. We also find that smaller firms having RPTs with principals tend to pay higher audit fees post-AS 18. Our study responds to the PCAOB's call to assess the economic consequences of AS 18. The findings suggest that AS 18 is associated with improved audit quality and reductions in auditees' opportunistic RPT activities. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources as cited in the article and from the authors upon request. JEL Classifications: M10; M40; M41; M42; M48. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Accounting Review. 2025/01, Vol. 100, Issue 1, p317
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Economics
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0001-4826
- DOI:10.2308/TAR-2021-0846
- Accession Number:181973281
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Accounting Review is the property of American Accounting Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.