For Argument's Sake.
Published In: National Review, 2023, v. 75, n. 10. P. 41 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: LILEKS, JAMES 3 of 3
Abstract
Apparently, debate meets will now resemble a Soviet show trial but without so much suspense over the outcome. Members of the debate team at James Madison University have decided that "free speech should not extend to requiring us to platform or amplify ideas that are exclusionary, discriminatory, or hostile." Athwart TURNS out we can't even have a debate about debating. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:National Review. 2023/05, Vol. 75, Issue 10, p41
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Education
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0028-0038
- Accession Number:163647215
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of National Review is the property of National Review Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.