JOURNAL ARTICLE

Are Millennials Different? A Time-Lag Study of Federal Millennial and Generation X Employees' Affective Commitment.

  • Published In: Public Personnel Management, 2023, v. 52, n. 2. P. 143 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Nguyen, Nhung Thi Hong 3 of 3

Abstract

This article examines generational differences in affective commitment—defined as employees' emotional attachment to their organization—between U.S. federal Millennials (born 1982–1999) and Generation Xers (born 1965–1981) under age 30, using a time-lag design with data from the 2004 Federal Human Capital Survey and the 2011 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. Contrary to common stereotypes that Millennials are less committed, the study finds that Millennials report slightly higher affective commitment than Generation Xers, with no significant differences in how managerial practices (support for work–life balance, financial rewards, and meaningful work) influence their commitment. The findings suggest that generational stereotypes may not accurately reflect public sector employees' attitudes and highlight meaningful work as the strongest factor associated with affective commitment among younger federal employees. The study contributes to public management scholarship by providing empirical evidence on generational attitudes in the public sector and cautions against tailoring management strategies based solely on generational assumptions.

Additional Information

  • Source:Public Personnel Management. 2023/06, Vol. 52, Issue 2, p143
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Education
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0091-0260
  • DOI:10.1177/00910260221129840
  • Accession Number:163764888
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Public Personnel Management is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.