JOURNAL ARTICLE
Epistemic injustice and neoliberal imaginations in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) policy.
Published In: Applied Linguistics Review, 2024, v. 15, n. 4. P. 1321 1 of 3
Database: Communication Source 2 of 3
Authored By: Phyak, Prem; Sah, Pramod K. 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the construction of epistemic injustice in creating and implementing an EMI policy. Drawing on "epistemic injustice" (Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press) and "misframing" (Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press), we discuss how the EMI policy in Nepal's school education has reinforced the epistemic nature of social injustice. Taking an ethnographic approach, we have analyzed how EMI policies are created, interpreted, and implemented in two public schools located in historically marginalized ethnic minority/Indigenous communities. Our analyses show that the schools misframe and misrecognize Indigenous/ethnic minority parents' and children's linguistic knowledge and awareness of language education policy. While reproducing neoliberal values, EMI policies construct a deficit identity of Indigenous/ethnic minority communities by erasing and stigmatizing their knowledge of mother tongues in school. Such policies not only promote an English-only monolingual ideology but also pose multiple challenges for epistemic access of Indigenous/minority students and affect parents' "party of participation" (Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of justice:Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press) in policymaking process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Applied Linguistics Review. 2024/07, Vol. 15, Issue 4, p1321
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Education
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1868-6303
- DOI:10.1515/applirev-2022-0070
- Accession Number:178477047
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Applied Linguistics Review is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.