JOURNAL ARTICLE

A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based AHP and TOPSIS Methodology for Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem of Industrial Facilities.

  • Published In: Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 2024, v. 43, n. 4-6. P. 473 1 of 3

  • Database: Applied Science & Technology Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: A., YUCEKAYA; AYAĞ, ZEKI 3 of 3

Abstract

Coal is still used widely by both industrial facilities and coal fired power plants. Lignite, hard coal, coke, and imported coal are some alternatives. The coal has ash content, moisture content, heat rate, volatile matter, carbon content, sulphur content, and size that need to be considered as well as price. The suppliers provide coal products for each coal type, and the most appropriate coal product needs to be selected considering different parameters. Therefore, in this paper, a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setsbased AHP (HFLTS-AHP) and TOPSIS method are used to select the best coal type alternative for industrial facilities. As the HFLTS-AHP is used to weight the evaluation criteria, TOPSIS is utilized to rank the fuel coal type alternatives. The proposed methodology offers an innovative and novel approach to help industrial facilities select the appropriate coal product while balancing the outputs, such as carbon, sulphur, ash content, and so on. In another point of view, the motivation of this research is to help industrial firms find out the ultimate fuel coal alternative based on their needs. This objective is realized using the proposed approach that integrates the HFLTS-AHP and TOPSIS approaches for the related problem, also utilizing group decision making. Moreover, this approach is concreted by an Excel template that provides an effective tool for firms to realize the evaluation process without many tiresome fuzzy comparisons and complex calculations. Furthermore, in the paper, a real-life case study in Turkish industrial facilities is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach to readers and practitioners. In this case, seven coal type options are evaluated in terms of eight criteria by three decision makers, and the best coal type alternative is determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing. 2024/10, Vol. 43, Issue 4-6, p473
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Environmental Sciences
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:15423980
  • Accession Number:180875260
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing is the property of Old City Publishing, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.