JOURNAL ARTICLE

Stem growth phenology, not canopy greening, constrains deciduous tree growth.

  • Published In: Tree Physiology, 2024, v. 44, n. 2. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Arend, Matthias; Hoch, Günter; Kahmen, Ansgar 3 of 3

Abstract

This article investigates the temporal relationship between canopy phenology and stem growth phenology in four temperate deciduous tree species—three diffuse-porous species (Fagus sylvatica, Acer pseudoplatanus, Carpinus betulus) and one ring-porous species (Quercus robur × petraea)—at the Swiss-Canopy-Crane II site over four climatically contrasting years. The study found that in diffuse-porous species, stem growth resumption lagged several weeks behind spring canopy greening, whereas in the ring-porous species, the two events were mostly synchronous. Additionally, individual trees with earlier and shorter main growth periods exhibited higher annual stem increments than those with later and longer growth periods, challenging the assumption that longer growth duration leads to greater annual growth. These findings suggest that canopy greening alone is an unreliable predictor of stem growth phenology and that intra-specific variation in growth timing complicates the use of canopy phenology for modeling forest productivity.

Additional Information

  • Source:Tree Physiology. 2024/02, Vol. 44, Issue 2, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Environmental Sciences
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0829-318X
  • DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpad160
  • Accession Number:175767005
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Tree Physiology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.