JOURNAL ARTICLE
Territorial Expansionists and Troublesome Locals: Daniel Clark at New Orleans and John Christian Schultz at Red River.
Published In: Western Historical Quarterly, 2024, v. 55, n. 1. P. 39 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Vernet, Julien 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the roles of Daniel Clark and John Christian Schultz as local expansionist figures who supported nineteenth-century American and Canadian territorial acquisitions in North America’s interior, specifically the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and the annexation of Rupert’s Land (1869–70). Clark, U.S. Consul at New Orleans, and Schultz, a Red River businessperson and newspaper owner, advocated for their nations’ claims while advancing their own political and commercial interests, often opposing local representative government and causing tensions with appointed administrators. Both men influenced eastern politicians’ perceptions of western territories but later became divisive figures in their communities, with Clark’s political career ending in disgrace and Schultz eventually attaining high office in Canada despite ongoing controversies. Their activities illustrate the complex local dynamics underpinning imperial expansion that often marginalized the rights and voices of indigenous peoples and existing settlers.
Additional Information
- Source:Western Historical Quarterly. 2024/03, Vol. 55, Issue 1, p39
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Geography and Cartography
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0043-3810
- DOI:10.1093/whq/whad123
- Accession Number:174979323
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Western Historical Quarterly is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.