Would a ban on genetic engineering of wildlife hamper conservation?

  • Published In: New Scientist, 2025, v. 268, n. 3565. P. 10 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Le Page, Michael 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the ongoing debate among conservationists regarding the potential use of genetic modification, particularly gene editing technologies like CRISPR, to address biodiversity loss and environmental challenges. A proposed motion at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) meeting seeks to impose a moratorium on genetic engineering of wildlife, which could significantly impact conservation funding and national laws. Proponents of the moratorium express concerns about the risks of gene drives and unintended consequences, while others argue that such technologies are essential for effective conservation efforts, especially in the face of climate change and invasive species. The discussion highlights differing perspectives on the role of human intervention in nature and the urgency of addressing biodiversity crises. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:New Scientist. 2025/10, Vol. 268, Issue 3565, p10
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0262-4079
  • Accession Number:188663186
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of New Scientist is the property of New Scientist Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.