JOURNAL ARTICLE

Us Versus Them? The Problem of Cognitive Distortions in Policing.

  • Published In: Police Quarterly, 2024, v. 27, n. 4. P. 532 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Wolfe, Scott E.; Mclean, Kyle; Alpert, Geoffrey P.; Rojek, Jeff 3 of 3

Abstract

This article examines how the cognitive distortion known as dichotomous thinking—defined as viewing situations or people in extreme, "all-or-nothing" terms—is associated with problematic police officer attitudes toward use of force and citizen interactions. Using two studies with U.S. police officers, dichotomous thinking was operationalized through a combination of high "warrior" (crime-fighting) and low "guardian" (community-oriented) mindsets in Study 1, and through officers' expressed suspicion and distrust of citizens in Study 2. Findings indicate that officers exhibiting dichotomous thinking were less supportive of de-escalation, procedural justice, and self-control, and more supportive of force-related misconduct; they also perceived greater threat and harmful intent in citizen encounters. The research suggests that such cognitive distortions may underlie persistent challenges in police reform and highlights the potential for recruitment, training, and cognitive-behavioral interventions to address these distorted perceptions within police subculture.

Additional Information

  • Source:Police Quarterly. 2024/12, Vol. 27, Issue 4, p532
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1098-6111
  • DOI:10.1177/10986111241234310
  • Accession Number:180103551
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Police Quarterly is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.