JOURNAL ARTICLE

Psychometric Properties of the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation in a Diverse Sample.

  • Published In: Assessment, 2026, v. 33, n. 3. P. 408 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Jeon, Min Eun; Goncearenco, Inna; Rogers, Megan L.; Campione, Marie T.; Lamis, Dorian A.; Kaslow, Nadine J.; Joiner, Thomas E. 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on evaluating the psychometric properties and generalizability of the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) within a diverse sample of 1,026 minoritized adults. Using item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses, the study found that the original 19-item BSS and previously proposed 5-item versions showed model misfit in this diverse sample, whereas a reduced 14-item scale demonstrated good unidimensionality, item fit, and measurement invariance across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, social class, and suicide attempt history. An alternative 8-item version also performed well but exhibited more DIF across subgroups, suggesting potential bias with further item reduction. The findings caution against using abbreviated 5-item BSS versions developed in majority-aligned samples for diverse populations and recommend the 14-item BSS as a more valid and equitable tool for assessing suicidal ideation severity in minoritized groups.

Additional Information

  • Source:Assessment. 2026/04, Vol. 33, Issue 3, p408
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:1073-1911
  • DOI:10.1177/10731911251330498
  • Accession Number:191764372
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Assessment is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.