JOURNAL ARTICLE
Limb-lead electrocardiography versus pulse oximetry for heart rate monitoring during neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room: A prospective observational study from developing country.
Published In: Tropical Doctor, 2026, v. 56, n. 2. P. 288 1 of 3
Database: CINAHL Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Thumar, Nikhil; Kalane, Shilpa; Rajhans, Arti 3 of 3
Abstract
This article focuses on comparing limb-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and pulse oximetry (PO) for heart rate monitoring during neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room. Conducted in a tertiary hospital in India with term and late pre-term neonates, the study found that while ECG lead placement took slightly longer than PO probe application, ECG provided a significantly faster and more reliable heart rate display (mean 25.3 seconds vs. 44.3 seconds, p < 0.0001). Limb-lead ECG was favored for its ease of application without interfering with resuscitation procedures, despite minor delays in neonates with vernix or meconium-stained skin. The authors suggest that ECG serves as a valuable adjunct to pulse oximetry, which also measures oxygen saturation, and recommend combined use for comprehensive monitoring during neonatal resuscitation.
Additional Information
- Source:Tropical Doctor. 2026/04, Vol. 56, Issue 2, p288
- Document Type:Journal Article
- Subject Area:Health and Medicine
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0049-4755
- DOI:10.1177/00494755251398124
- Accession Number:192154272
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.