JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reverse symbolic action and quiescence: a critical exploration of anti-abortion rhetoric and movement activation.

  • Published In: Communication Theory (1050-3293), 2025, v. 35, n. 2. P. 118 1 of 3

  • Database: Communication Source 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Marquess, Mackenzie O 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the theory of reverse symbolic action to explain the political and social dynamics following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade. It argues that extreme anti-abortion rhetoric by Republican Party leaders, particularly during a post-Dobbs House Republican news conference, unintentionally demobilized the pro-life movement (quiescence) while activating and energizing the pro-choice movement. The theory identifies three dimensions: policy action producing quiescence, rhetorical overreach, and unintentional activation of the opposing base. Evidence from Twitter responses and the 2022 midterm election results supports this framework, showing increased pro-choice mobilization and a decline in pro-life political momentum. The article situates these developments within broader U.S. culture wars and political polarization, highlighting how extreme rhetoric can backfire by motivating opposition rather than consolidating support.

Additional Information

  • Source:Communication Theory (1050-3293). 2025/05, Vol. 35, Issue 2, p118
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1050-3293
  • DOI:10.1093/ct/qtae022
  • Accession Number:185321835
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Communication Theory (1050-3293) is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.