JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reducing waste in parenteral nutrition: comparison of Surgical- and Standard-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique.

  • Published In: British Journal of Nursing, 2025, v. 34, n. 8. P. S19 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Malhi, Hardip; Fletcher, Jane 3 of 3

Abstract

The NHS accounts for approximately 4% of carbon emissions in England. Aseptic techniques are an area where the use of consumables, and subsequent waste, may be high. Traditionally, administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) has been performed using a so-called sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare the volume of waste generated from a traditional 'sterile' technique (Surgical-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT)), using sterile gloves and a dressing pack, and Standard-ANTT, using non-sterile gloves, a general aseptic field and a micro-critical aseptic field where necessary in the administration of PN. Two procedure trays were arranged representing consumable equipment used in each procedure. All items including packaging were weighed. Standard-ANTT demonstrated an estimated 52% reduction in waste and carbon emissions. There is a pressing need for nurses to review practice and consider where more sustainable choices can be made in the administration of PN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:British Journal of Nursing. 2025/04, Vol. 34, Issue 8, pS19
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0966-0461
  • DOI:10.12968/bjon.2024.0255
  • Accession Number:184604420
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of British Journal of Nursing is the property of Mark Allen Holdings Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.